Scuba Instructor Charged with Criminally Negligent Homicide
#1
Posted 29 July 2008 - 07:31 PM
29th July 2008
A former scuba instructor at the University of Alabama has been charged with criminally negligent homicide in the death of one of her students in class last year.
Allison Rainey Gibson, 44, turned herself into authorities Friday after being indicted by a grand jury last month.
Student Zachary Moore, 21, died from an air embolism in April 2007. Moore apparently ascended to the surface of the pool too quickly and didn't exhale to release some of the air in his lungs, officials said at the time.
"They felt obviously that there was negligence on the part of the instructor that rose to a criminal level," said Capt. Lloyd Baker, commander of the Tuscaloosa County Metro Homicide Unit.
A junior from Fairhope, Moore was a member of the Theta Chi fraternity and was taking business classes. UA stopped offering the scuba class following his death, said UA spokeswoman Cathy Andreen. Gibson was contracted to work
for the university, she said, and no longer teaches there.
Criminally negligent homicide is a Class A misdemeanor and is punishable of up to a year in jail and a $5,000 fine.
Court records provide no information about what evidence the grand jury heard before deciding to indict Gibson. According to the indictment, members of the grand jury believe that Gibson failed to directly supervise Moore as he performed the dangerous exercise.
Moore died from an air embolism, which occurs after air bubbles form in the bloodstream and stop blood from reaching vital organs. They occur in scuba accidents because divers are breathing pressurized air.
Around 20 members of the beginning scuba class were participating in an exercise in which they dove to the bottom of the pool, left their equipment on the bottom and ascended back to the surface.
Moore apparently returned to the surface of the pool at the UA Aquatic Center too quickly and didn't exhale to release some of the air, according to the autopsy report.
"A good marriage is like an interlocking neurosis, where the rocks in one person's head fill up the holes in the other's."
#2
Posted 29 July 2008 - 07:49 PM
If you can't eat it or play with it,
Just pee on it and walk away.
#3
Posted 30 July 2008 - 05:52 AM
-JimG
Edited by cmt489, 30 July 2008 - 07:34 AM.
Topic title has been corrected to properly reflect the charges.
#4
Posted 30 July 2008 - 05:53 AM
By all that is wet, I do hereby swear, (politely), and attest, upon pain of never diving again, (real or imagined), that I understand and affirm, that I agree to the above.
_________________________________________(log in name signature)
Signed and Dated
#5
Posted 30 July 2008 - 06:01 AM
#6
Posted 30 July 2008 - 06:11 AM
...but of course no one on the jury can be a diver or have ever known one!
What? How do you come by this bit of info.
#7
Posted 30 July 2008 - 06:20 AM
It would be interesting to know if any of the other students in the course felt they were properly instructed on this matter.
When you make fish laugh, they can't bite you.
#8
Posted 30 July 2008 - 06:58 AM
well, not everything, but defenatly the part of not holding your breath.
about the only reason I can think of for him holding his breath is he panicked and thought he had to surface right that instant. I have seen other students do this, but they were all blowing bubbles as they went.
#9
Posted 30 July 2008 - 07:57 AM
But I am curious like BubbleBoy is...
It would be interesting to know if any of the other students in the course felt they were properly instructed on this matter.
Mike
Edited by Bubble2Bubble, 30 July 2008 - 08:00 AM.
no trees were harmed while posting any of my messages,
however a significant number of electrons were inconvenienced.
Buy Lawn Mower and Chain Saw Parts at...
Amazon.com
#10
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:11 AM
...but of course no one on the jury can be a diver or have ever known one!
What? How do you come by this bit of info.
Hey PF, I think what LA is saying is that due to the nature and methodology used to select jury members, any prosecuting attorney is going to automatically dismiss anyone who might be sympathetic to the dive instructor, which basically includes anyone who has ever dove or has friends that dive. I would agree with him here, I think the jury will end up being a bunch of people who know little or nothing about diving and to me that's not particularly fair and IMHO it's not really a jury of peers either.
This whole story is very, very sad, as is any tragedy, but along with everyone else, I would have to challenge the assumption that the dive instructor is at fault for something a student should have known well and apparently all the other students did. Of course, we're only seeing a fractional splinter of all the facts in the case, but quite frankly, how can an instructor more closely supervise your exhaling? Seems to me that it may just be opening another can of worms in the never-ending "age of unaccountability" that reigns supreme in our country these days. Very sad.
TheScubaCowboy
Buy the special SingleDivers.com version of my SCUBA MUSIC CD "Just A Scuba Cowboy" here for only $15 with savings on multiple copies... each one is personally autographed and it's the perfect gift for divers and non-divers alike!
#11
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:12 AM
The very first time I used SCUBA (back in 1961), the one and only thing my swim team friend told me was "Don't hold your breath." That was just an informal situation, not a class. I can't imagine an actual class session that wasn't preceded by this advice.
#12 Guest_TexasStarfish_*
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:24 AM
I don't understand how an instructor can prevent some one from holding his or her breath. All you can do is tell your students not to and what the reprecussions are. If she had stopped him on the way up, he would have drowned because no scuba gear. And its not like you can make some one breath out....
It just all seems a little weird to me. Can anyone offer me any clarity.
#13
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:45 AM
This is a misconception that was brought up quite a bit on another thread not long ago (the death of the wife on her honeymoon in Australia). Attorneys only have so many strikes when picking a jury and it is very possible a diver could end up on the jury. Attorneys and paralegals usually don't get picked either, but I've known paralegals that have been picked and even grand juries to include attorneys before....but of course no one on the jury can be a diver or have ever known one!
What? How do you come by this bit of info.
#14
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:46 AM
I feel for both sides of this situation. All we can do at this point is hope that ALL points are brought out in this particular case. No one ever wants to see a death, but you also don't want to see someone wrongly accused while trying to do there job.
If you can't eat it or play with it,
Just pee on it and walk away.
#15
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:30 AM
As an instructor I'm a little confused. In what beginning class do you leave the gear at the bottom of the pool and surface? I am both a NAUI and PADI Instructor and I have never done that in my open water courses. The first time I ever ditched my gear at the bottom of the pool was either in my Master Diver or Divemaster class.
Taking the gear off and returning to the surface without it was common practice in the old PADI/YMCA classes of the early 70's when I worked as a DM. The student would then dive back down, turn on the air, put on weight belt and clear the mask before doning the rest of the gear.
By all that is wet, I do hereby swear, (politely), and attest, upon pain of never diving again, (real or imagined), that I understand and affirm, that I agree to the above.
_________________________________________(log in name signature)
Signed and Dated
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users