Jump to content

  • These forums are for "after booking" trip communications, socializing, and/or trip questions ONLY.
  • You will NOT be able to book a trip, buy add-ons, or manage your trip by logging in here. Please login HERE to do any of those things.

Photo

Nitrox training...


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#31 Diverbrian

Diverbrian

    I spend too much time on line

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,620 posts
  • Location:Sanford, MI
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:SSI DiveCon/IANTD Normoxic Trimix.....
  • Logged Dives:200+

Posted 30 November 2005 - 11:03 PM

Kamala, the benefits of enriched air have been known for a LONG time. The military and commercial divers have been enjoying the benefits for more than 50 years. If you mean why did THEY start doing it, well simple. It was beacause the workers or military divers could dive longer and do more work in relative safety. If you mean how did it come to pass that recreational divers were using it, thank NOAA for experimenting and bringing it to the forefront. They (amongst others) took away the voodoo effects of breathing enriched air.

We talked a lot about this in my Adv. Nitrox class but to be honest, I was far more interested in learning the gas laws. I'd suggest picking up a copy of the NOAA diving manual, and Kevin Gurr's book if you want to delve further into this stuff.



Thanks Perrone that is good information. Curious if they started using nitrox to work longer were they limited by the MOD limitations?


One thing... The British and US military lost a fair portion of their divers (UDT types) to ox tox because of the work involved in laying mines and such. This was a "hazard of the job" during WWII.
A person should be judged in this life not by the mistakes that they make nor by the number of them. Rather they are to be judged by their recovery from them.

#32 PerroneFord

PerroneFord

    I spend too much time on line

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,303 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 November 2005 - 11:42 PM

The Italians pioneered this UDT stuff from what I remember from the BUD/S books. Were they on open circut or rebreathers I wonder.

#33 Diverbrian

Diverbrian

    I spend too much time on line

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,620 posts
  • Location:Sanford, MI
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:SSI DiveCon/IANTD Normoxic Trimix.....
  • Logged Dives:200+

Posted 01 December 2005 - 01:46 AM

The Italians pioneered this UDT stuff from what I remember from the BUD/S books. Were they on open circut or rebreathers I wonder.


As the Brits copied the Italians in this field, I would bet that they were on oxygen rebreathers as well.
A person should be judged in this life not by the mistakes that they make nor by the number of them. Rather they are to be judged by their recovery from them.

#34 Dennis

Dennis

    Everyone knows me

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 895 posts
  • Location:Williamsburg, VA and Sebastian, FL
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:AOW, Open Water II, & Nitrox
  • Logged Dives:200+

Posted 01 December 2005 - 07:18 AM

But why did anyone start using Nitrox in the first place?


Kamala,

I took the class for some additional training, to lower my nitrogen loading for multiple day, multiple dive situations, and for those dives that I want more bottom time and less surface interval between dives. For what other reason would you take training?
DSSW,
Dennis
"Suppose you were an idiot ... And suppose you were a member of Congress ... But I repeat myself." --Mark Twain

#35 Diverbrian

Diverbrian

    I spend too much time on line

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,620 posts
  • Location:Sanford, MI
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:SSI DiveCon/IANTD Normoxic Trimix.....
  • Logged Dives:200+

Posted 01 December 2005 - 12:14 PM

But why did anyone start using Nitrox in the first place?


Kamala,

I took the class for some additional training, to lower my nitrogen loading for multiple day, multiple dive situations, and for those dives that I want more bottom time and less surface interval between dives. For what other reason would you take training?


Dennis,

She is talking about history. Why would someone come up with the idea of diving air with a higher percentage of oxygen and what was the original purpose?

The benefits of nitrox in this day and age are well known. But back in the forties and fifties, they weren't as obvious to those outside of commercial or military diving. So how did we get from there to now?
A person should be judged in this life not by the mistakes that they make nor by the number of them. Rather they are to be judged by their recovery from them.

#36 ereediver

ereediver

    People are starting to get to know me

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 236 posts
  • Location:Cleveland,Ohio
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:Open water, AOW
  • Logged Dives:17

Posted 04 December 2005 - 09:11 PM

Kamala, asking loaded questions are we ? Now it will be a long time before I get the answer.

#37 TraceMalin

TraceMalin

    Everyone knows me

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 767 posts
  • Location:Clifton Beach
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:Junior Jedi Knight
  • Logged Dives:6000+ (combined scuba & extended range freedives)

Posted 06 December 2005 - 06:59 PM

I'll answer briefly. Nitrox was first used as a balloonist's gas. Helium was the gas which people knew would allow for deeper diving, but the cost was prohibitive until it was discovered in large pockets underground in Texas. Then, it became more widely used for commercial diving, military and scientific applications. Nitrox wasn't initially used with any real known benefit as a primary breathing gas, but rather as a deco gas. Brett Gilliam (founder of TDI) began experimenting with it as a deco gas while working for the U.S. Navy off St. Croix. Brian should know what he was filming.

Questions:

1) What project was Gilliam working on for the US Navy?
2) What was he and his team filming?
3) What major problem was his dive team facing that caused him to want to use nitrox?
4) What less well known deep diving record does Gilliam have other than his known deep air record that was directly related to the project?

Trace
Trace Malinowski
Technical Training Director
PDIC International

#38 6Gill

6Gill

    Everyone knows me

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 725 posts
  • Location:North Vancouver
  • Gender:Male
  • Logged Dives:100+

Posted 29 December 2005 - 10:18 PM

Trace,

1)evaluatinging anti submarine warfare detection systems
2)filming the hydrophones in active operation
3)oceanic white tip sharks
4)not sure on this one,he was doing some Heliox stuff (all his records past tense now)

Some other trivia NOAA set up NOAA 1(32%) and NOAA 2(36%) as alot of their diving was done at shallower depth(reefs) and this gave them more bottom time.It was out of this that Nitrox moved into the mainstream fighting and clawing againts the mainstream who fought to keep it in the basement.Belive it or not but alot of people in the indusrty fought againt it even some that embrace it now :banghead:

The early UDT used O2 rebreathers...most of thrir work was shallow so bubbles were bad.

trivia question time...
1)Helium use in diving was developed by the USN...why was no one else experimenting with helium(hint-Hindinburg)
2)name a couple other inert gases that have been tried...extra worthless bounus points for stating why they haven't replaced helium.

Eric

#39 Scott

Scott

    On a roll now.....

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 75 posts
  • Location:Tampa, Florida. Home of José Gaspar
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:OWSI
  • Logged Dives:1000+ (I have fallen into a bad habbit of only logging dives not involved with work lately.)

Posted 29 December 2005 - 10:52 PM

Ok now I'm really confused...

how in the world do dogs have anything to do with nitrox??? :wacko:


I think that is a question only the Navy could answer...maybe.

But the key word in Nitrox training and selling Nitrox classes is "SAFETY." You are really forced to plan your dive and diving your plan in EANx class. I can not speak highly enough of the value. I know that as a PADI instructor it is the first class that I really discuss fatality.

Oxygen toxicity is a nasty thing; much nastier than Nitrogen Narcosis.

Keep in mind, though, that if your instructor is anything like me (s)he will have you figure in reduced o2%'s for your profiles as well. If your instructor is cave, wreck or deep inclined you will probably get a better class with a good stress on theory.

At least that has been my experience. Your milage may vary.

Enjoy! Be Safe and Keep WET!
-Scott

#40 Diverbrian

Diverbrian

    I spend too much time on line

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,620 posts
  • Location:Sanford, MI
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:SSI DiveCon/IANTD Normoxic Trimix.....
  • Logged Dives:200+

Posted 29 December 2005 - 11:27 PM

Trace,

1)evaluatinging anti submarine warfare detection systems
2)filming the hydrophones in active operation
3)oceanic white tip sharks
4)not sure on this one,he was doing some Heliox stuff (all his records past tense now)

Some other trivia NOAA set up NOAA 1(32%) and NOAA 2(36%) as alot of their diving was done at shallower depth(reefs) and this gave them more bottom time.It was out of this that Nitrox moved into the mainstream fighting and clawing againts the mainstream who fought to keep it in the basement.Belive it or not but alot of people in the indusrty fought againt it even some that embrace it now :banghead:

The early UDT used O2 rebreathers...most of thrir work was shallow so bubbles were bad.

trivia question time...
1)Helium use in diving was developed by the USN...why was no one else experimenting with helium(hint-Hindinburg)
2)name a couple other inert gases that have been tried...extra worthless bounus points for stating why they haven't replaced helium.

Eric


I stayed out of the question as I did some "war games" in that area. The gov't loved it for geographical reasons. We didn't get to enjoy the water :cool2: .

On your other questions:

1) One of the other gases being played with was hydrogen. I would guess that after people saw the bad points of hydrogen, they didn't want to play with modifying basic air.

2) a) hydrogen: It's highly explosive and had issues with causing hallucinations.
b) neon: expensive, not good on the brain (similar effects to High Pressure Nervous Syndrome)
c) argon: turns out to be more narcotic than nitrogen
A person should be judged in this life not by the mistakes that they make nor by the number of them. Rather they are to be judged by their recovery from them.

#41 TraceMalin

TraceMalin

    Everyone knows me

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 767 posts
  • Location:Clifton Beach
  • Gender:Male
  • Cert Level:Junior Jedi Knight
  • Logged Dives:6000+ (combined scuba & extended range freedives)

Posted 30 December 2005 - 03:39 AM

Trace,

1)evaluatinging anti submarine warfare detection systems
2)filming the hydrophones in active operation
3)oceanic white tip sharks
4)not sure on this one,he was doing some Heliox stuff (all his records past tense now)

Some other trivia NOAA set up NOAA 1(32%) and NOAA 2(36%) as alot of their diving was done at shallower depth(reefs) and this gave them more bottom time.It was out of this that Nitrox moved into the mainstream fighting and clawing againts the mainstream who fought to keep it in the basement.Belive it or not but alot of people in the indusrty fought againt it even some that embrace it now :teeth:

The early UDT used O2 rebreathers...most of thrir work was shallow so bubbles were bad.

trivia question time...
1)Helium use in diving was developed by the USN...why was no one else experimenting with helium(hint-Hindinburg)
2)name a couple other inert gases that have been tried...extra worthless bounus points for stating why they haven't replaced helium.

Eric


Eric,

You're correct with your answers except #4. Gilliam was involved in the deepest shark attack recorded at 230 fsw off Cane Bay, St. Croix in 1972 when his buddy Rodney Temple was killed by oceanic white tips. The attack began at 230 fsw and the divers ended up at 270 - 300 fsw deep. Temple died while Gilliam was towing him as the sharks struck repeatedly. Gilliam ran out of gas and gave Temple an OOG signal to which he received no response. Temple had stopped screaming and his body was limp so Gilliam assumed he was already dead. Gilliam tried to reach Temple's back up regulator, but couldn't because the sharks struck Temple's body again. Gilliam ditched Temple's weights and inflated his BC just as the sharks pulled the body away. Gilliam then made an emergency ascent. I'm not sure, but this may still be the deepest shark attack on record.

Trace
Trace Malinowski
Technical Training Director
PDIC International

#42 6Gill

6Gill

    Everyone knows me

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 725 posts
  • Location:North Vancouver
  • Gender:Male
  • Logged Dives:100+

Posted 30 December 2005 - 07:56 PM

Hi Trace,
Didn't realize both events were tied in togather...here is hoping that record will stand.

As Trace stated the world's helium supply is a by-product of the Texas gas industry.Airships were military and its definitly advantages in using gas that is inert when people are shooting at you :thankyou:. The US government made helium a controled good,so in effect no one else had a decent scorce and was forced to use hydrogen
COMEX was experimenting into the early 80 with hydrogen in place of helium(bet the no smoking policy was strict) but found no advantage for a number of reasons plus airships aren't that common in military applications

Eric




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users