HID vs. LED
#1
Posted 26 October 2006 - 09:25 AM
Option 1:
10 Watt 6200K HID Head
240 Min Burn Time
2000 hr lamp life
Option 2:
105Watt 5800K LED Head
180 Min Burn Time
8000 hr lamp life
What are some of the differences (e.g. color, brightness, etc.)? Which do you prefer and why? Thanks in advance!
"Love is blind but lust likes lacy panties" -- SanDiegoCarol
"If you're gonna be dumb, you'd better be tough." -- Phillip Manor
"If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't I'll just respond cleverly." -- Donald Rumsfeld
#2
Posted 26 October 2006 - 10:12 AM
First a word on LED vs HID
Honestly, LED looks very bright if you are not used to working with HID. It gives excellent burn time, and decent light color and quality. LEDs probably won't burn out in your lifetime. HID offers better light quality and more penetration into darkness. It's more fragile. It's the technology of choice.
And a word on Greenforce
It's a good light. It's not a great light. From a reliability perspective, it's nearly bulletproof. They work. They are hard to break. On the bad side, the light heads provide too wide of a beam to be useful in murk, and they make it hard to signal over distance, even in clear water. The handle options are all poor in my opinion and I've used all 3. The cost for the lights is out of all proportion for what you are getting. There are far better quality lights available for less money.
I have been in the water with Dive Rites, Salvos, Halcyons, GreenForce, and Sarteks. I would own the Greenforce over the Dive Rite if price was not factored in. With price factored the Dive Rite is a clear winner. I'd own any of the other lights irrespective of price, over the Greenforce.
I would not own an LED primary light at this point. They are just not as good as HID. Period.
Backup lights, especially the 3C cell lights from Gulftex and Heser, are a different story. That is a GREAT application for LED.
There are some good deals available on HID canister lights. If you've got money to spend, I'll point you in the right direction. If you're just window shopping for now, I'll let you finish that process.
-P
#3
Posted 26 October 2006 - 10:56 AM
I prefer the HID technology, as I find it hotter (whiter) and more penetrating than LED.
I found the LED much more yellow in color.
The HID bulb is more fragile and more expensive to replace.
At the end of the day it's really a matter of preference and "cost" tolerance.
You need to actually compare both, so use two lights, not just two heads on the same cannister.
I suggest that you get into a dark room, turn both on and pick the one you prefer!
Cornel
Excellence is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, skillful execution and the vision to see obstacles as opportunities.
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards!
#4
Posted 26 October 2006 - 11:00 AM
"For the diligent diver, closed circuit rebreathers are actually safer than open circuit scuba." Tom Mount
#5
Posted 26 October 2006 - 11:11 AM
When I got in the cave for the first time, the Dive Rite's narrow beam was EASILY superior to the Greenforce for signaling and penetrating distance. Both pale in comparison to the Halcyon, Salvo, and Sarteks.
-P
I suggest that you get into a dark room, turn both on and pick the one you prefer!
Cornel
#6
Posted 26 October 2006 - 11:46 AM
Still, it is a nice light. I was impressed with the apparent durability of the Greenforce lights, but I was not aware of issues with cutting through the murk like my DiveRite does.
#7
Posted 26 October 2006 - 11:55 AM
I have no direct experience with the GreenForce lights, but I'm also a little concerned about the umbilical. From the description it doesn't look like the length of it is adjustable. I have my light cord adjusted so that when I am horizontal, it stretches from the top of the canister (which is on my right hip) to my outstretched left hand - no extra slack. If the GreenForce umbilical doesn't allow for any adjustment, then that would be a serious negative in my opinion.
#8
Posted 26 October 2006 - 12:30 PM
The Greenforce 10w HID has a beam spread of ~13 degrees. The 21w head spread is closer to 20 degrees. There is no 18w option.
The Greenforce umbilical is NOT length adjustable.
The Dive Rite 4.5a 10w canister is available for $499.
The Salvo 4.5a 10w canister is available for $580 ($700 msrp).
The Greenforce is the most expensive option I've seen at 10w/4.5a
Just my observations.
#9
Posted 26 October 2006 - 04:23 PM
I think EE has some on sale too.
#10
Posted 26 October 2006 - 05:31 PM
"Love is blind but lust likes lacy panties" -- SanDiegoCarol
"If you're gonna be dumb, you'd better be tough." -- Phillip Manor
"If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't I'll just respond cleverly." -- Donald Rumsfeld
#11
Posted 27 October 2006 - 09:25 AM
When backed up by trials and experiences they make sense and should be listened to and considered.
Although LED technology has improved substantially and grown in popularity,
I do favor the HID as a primary.
Thanks for sharing your field experience.
Cornel
At the risk of seeming contrary, I am going to disagree here. I did this A/B test at home with the greenforce HID/LED and the Dive Rite MR11 head. All looked pretty nice. In my first overhead dive, I could tell the LED just wasn't getting it done.
When I got in the cave for the first time, the Dive Rite's narrow beam was EASILY superior to the Greenforce for signaling and penetrating distance. Both pale in comparison to the Halcyon, Salvo, and Sarteks.
-PI suggest that you get into a dark room, turn both on and pick the one you prefer!
Cornel
Excellence is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, skillful execution and the vision to see obstacles as opportunities.
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards!
#12
Posted 30 October 2006 - 10:03 PM
Besides having a small LED backup light all my other dive lights have now been retired to household duty and camping lights.
B2B
no trees were harmed while posting any of my messages,
however a significant number of electrons were inconvenienced.
Buy Lawn Mower and Chain Saw Parts at...
Amazon.com
#13
Posted 06 November 2006 - 03:13 PM
#14
Posted 07 November 2006 - 08:41 AM
Then I dove with my buddies who have HID lights.
My LED was a poor light compared to theirs.
I think another thing to consider is WHERE you are diving and planning on using this light.
I know in the PNW "more" light is almost always prefered.
Formerly known as gis_gal and name tattoo'd for a small bribe!
#15
Posted 07 November 2006 - 03:12 PM
I loved my Light Cannon while it lasted. But frankly, I disliked the expensive and fragile bulb. HID's are definitely brighter, whiter, more focused, but I can't deal with the lack of what I call the "klutz factor" and the costs involved. If the bulbs were only $20 a pop, I could probably deal with that, but not $100! Mine broke the first time with just normal usage (well, what I was used to as normal usage). Ok, I'll replace it once, I told myself. I handled it with TLC after that and even got a little padded case for it. But when it broke again from an 18" drop to a carpeted floor just a short time later, I laid it to rest. For the price of a bulb, I went with the Shockwave II LED and am fairly content with it, particularly the high "klutz factor". I believe LED technology will eventually be par with HID. There was an article in Science News about a month or two ago that they've already developed an LED that is 7 times brighter than the ones on the market today. But it's not there yet.
If available funds are high, your "klutz factor" is low, then go with an HID (if you're considering Green Force, then I assume you have a healthy budget). If you dive mostly in 70ft+ vis waters, HID is an overkill.
"A good marriage is like an interlocking neurosis, where the rocks in one person's head fill up the holes in the other's."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users