great medium depth wreck SE FL !
#16
Posted 27 October 2004 - 05:09 AM
DSSW,
WWW™
#17
Posted 27 October 2004 - 08:25 AM
No offense taken by ME, Walter! I already know I'm not ready... (but, we're gonna work on that, right?)No offense intended Kevin, but neither you nor Marvel are ready for the Hydro. I'd suggest trimix on that wreck.
"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else." C. S. Lewis
#18
Posted 27 October 2004 - 09:35 AM
The plan was for them to stay together as a group at all times. They would descend the line, go no deeper than the main deck, explore no more than 5 minutes, then ascend along the wreck and make their ascent together up the line making decompression stops we agreed on.
They made the dive. They descended together down the line. At about 120 feet, one diver started to feel uneasy and decided that was deep enough for her. She signaled to her buddies she wasn't comfortable descending any further. The other two divers left her at 120 by herself and continued down to the main deck. After a short exploration of the main deck, they dropped over the side and continued down to about 175. After a short swim along the sand, they ascended to the main deck, explored a bit then ascended to the wheelhouse. They hooked back up with the buddy they'd abandoned and made their ascent with decompression stops.
They trashed their entire dive plan at depth as a result of the affects of narcosis. They abandoned their weakest member leaving her as a solo diver (she wasn't ready for solo diving either) at a depth she'd never before experienced while she was feeling uneasy. All three of them could have easily died on this dive.
The Hydro is not a dive to undertake lightly.
DSSW,
WWW™
#19
Posted 27 October 2004 - 06:20 PM
no offense taken walter and your correct it is the type of diveThe Hydro is not a dive to undertake lightly.
that has to be taken seriously. The two divers that left the diver on the line
to proceed with the plan without the woman are two divers i would never dive with again. The two divers who proceeded without the third diver are not only ignorant
but were very disrespectful of the third diver. In the 2 1/2 years i've been diving
I've learned it's probably gonna be someone elses decisions that gets me in trouble rather than my own....thanks for the word of caution and your story emphasizes the importance of chosing buddies you really can trust to do the right thing !
Kevin Falconer Fort Myers, FL
#20
Posted 27 October 2004 - 06:29 PM
walter, hard to believe the decision was made as a result of narcosisThey trashed their entire dive plan at depth as a result of the affects of narcosis.
particularly since i would assume that at the end of the descent
not enough time had elapsed to start any narcosis ...... I'm goin' with
ignorance on this one !
Kevin Falconer
#21
Posted 27 October 2004 - 06:36 PM
Kevin...you want me to comment on this????The two divers that left the diver on the line
to proceed with the plan without the woman are two divers i would never dive with again. The two divers who proceeded without the third diver are not only ignorant
but were very disrespectful of the third diver. <snip>and your story emphasizes the importance of chosing buddies you really can trust to do the right thing !
Kevin Falconer Fort Myers, FL
#22
Posted 27 October 2004 - 08:15 PM
It was the result of narcosis. They are both very responsible people. I wouldn't hesitate to trust my life to either of them on the surface or at relatively shallow depths.
Narcosis hits quickly. They were not aware of any symptoms of narcosis at any point in the dive. That doesn't negate the fact three intelligent people were downright stupid at depth.
My point was to instill in you the concept that this dive is inherently dangerous. When you are certified in the use of trimix is the time to consider this dive. This dive can kill you. I want you to stick around a long time, buddy.
DSSW,
WWW™
#23
Posted 28 October 2004 - 08:51 PM
hey pipe down........we'll call you if we have any beachKevin...you want me to comment on this????
diving issues that need deliberating !
Kevin Falconer Fort Myers, FL
#24
Posted 28 October 2004 - 09:06 PM
walter, your point was well taken and I don't know these people that you discussNarcosis hits quickly. They were not aware of any symptoms of narcosis at any point in the dive. That doesn't negate the fact three intelligent people were downright stupid at depth.
but if i were the diver left alone on the line I wouldn't be so quick to accept the "narcosis" defense. I think there are many intelligent divers
that do stupid things, there are also many different personalities in this
sport and sometimes these actions are as much a result of a personality
or attitude as they are their training.
Kevin
#25
Posted 29 October 2004 - 04:42 AM
Buddies are buddies no matter where you divehey pipe down........we'll call you if we have any beachKevin...you want me to comment on this????
diving issues that need deliberating !
Kevin Falconer Fort Myers, FL
#26
Posted 29 October 2004 - 08:06 AM
Anyone can go deep. It's no accomplishment. The accomplishment is to get the proper training ahead of time and make all your dives safe ones.
DSSW,
WWW™
#27
Posted 30 October 2004 - 06:22 AM
walter, proper training is essential unfortunately proper trainingAnyone can go deep. It's no accomplishment. The accomplishment is to get the proper training ahead of time and make all your dives safe ones.
does not always turn out divers with good judgement and good
decision making skills. No one makes perfect decisions in every
situation but the ones that make the foolish decisions in critical
situations, below 100 fsw for example, are the ones that you may
want to reconsider as your buddy.
Kevin
#28
Posted 30 October 2004 - 06:29 AM
your right jenny, but i think there are divers that don't make the proper adjustments as dives become more dangerous. your attention to properBuddies are buddies no matter where you dive
buddy procedures needs to be "ratcheted up" as you move from
a shallow reef dive to say a penetraion dive or very deep water dive.
If you ever dive with me below 100 fsw you will receive as much concern as you've ever had from a buddy, no one can know what their buddy is thinking but
if you dive with me as much thought is being put into your safety as mine !
Kevin Falconer
#29
Posted 30 October 2004 - 06:45 AM
Kevin. I think you are missing something here that I am nonchalantely trying to say TO YOU....your right jenny, but i think there are divers that don't make the proper adjustments as dives become more dangerous. your attention to properBuddies are buddies no matter where you dive
buddy procedures needs to be "ratcheted up" as you move from
a shallow reef dive to say a penetraion dive or very deep water dive.
If you ever dive with me below 100 fsw you will receive as much concern as you've ever had from a buddy, no one can know what their buddy is thinking but
if you dive with me as much thought is being put into your safety as mine !
Kevin Falconer
I have done a couple beach dives with you, and we have discussed what happened after the dive. Do I need to put it out here for all to read?
Reflection, my friend, reflection on what happened during those two dives. How could I expect anything different from you at depth?
#30
Posted 31 October 2004 - 05:57 AM
Jenny, are you flirting with me ?
Kevin
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users