More proof...
#1
Posted 12 January 2005 - 12:34 AM
Get this... a class where I have to do dives below 130 ft. (but no deeper than 200 ft.)!
#2
Posted 12 January 2005 - 05:56 AM
mmm
#3
Posted 12 January 2005 - 09:17 AM
#4
Posted 12 January 2005 - 10:41 AM
But I guess someone has to dive that deep to see what is there....as for me, I will keep it at about 100' or less, that makes me very happy....
Linda
Linda
#5
Posted 12 January 2005 - 10:52 AM
While I have no desire to got that deep....at least it is laudable the young lad is getting the proper training.
Best of luck to ya and let me know what you see that deep.
rich
#6
Posted 12 January 2005 - 10:57 AM
#7
Posted 12 January 2005 - 11:17 AM
"Love is blind but lust likes lacy panties" -- SanDiegoCarol
"If you're gonna be dumb, you'd better be tough." -- Phillip Manor
"If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't I'll just respond cleverly." -- Donald Rumsfeld
#8
Posted 12 January 2005 - 11:19 AM
Actually, I just want the option to use tri-mix on some of my deeper forays (like the Forest City at 150 ft.). Air works, but better options are now available and I would like to use the safest ones so that my dive buddy doesn't beat me up!
Edited by Diverbrian, 12 January 2005 - 11:20 AM.
#9
Posted 12 January 2005 - 11:38 AM
DSSW,
WWW™
#10
Posted 12 January 2005 - 11:50 AM
max
if your not living on the edge...your takin up to much space
landlocked by misfortune
"Kindness to others is the rent we pay for our time on Earth". - Muhammad Ali
#11
Posted 12 January 2005 - 11:59 AM
I appreciate the thought, but winding up like Chris and Chrissy Rouse is not on my list of things to do. Likely I will get there. There is only one step after this and that is the hypoxic trimix. I would like to get comfortable in the 130-200 ft. range before doing the wrecks over there. The nice thing about the Great Lakes is that they will still be there in all of their splendor in a few years when I am ready.
Much below 300 ft., it becomes difficult to take enough gas with you to satisfy deco requirements. It becomes an entirely different game then. I don't like hang tanks for this kind of diving. If you miss the line, you may have to make the decision of wether or not to surface without deco or drown. That is a poor choice to have to make.
Besides, if I am not careful, my dive buddy will inflict grevious bodily harm on me. That might hurt .
#12
Posted 12 January 2005 - 12:06 PM
DSSW,
WWW™
#13
Posted 12 January 2005 - 12:21 PM
#14
Posted 12 January 2005 - 12:37 PM
Actually, that is a great point and why so many tech divers are using FFM and Comms gear. The local group up here is borderline from investing in that kind of gear. If I get dive buddies that are interested, that would be a safety margin that I wouldn't feel too badly about.Kinda why they should use underwater communication more often(radio)??? Hey guys, I'm coming up with no deco stop, call a helo and let me know when to surface?? Or at least to better communicate with the boat to GET the tanks needed to come up.
Also, I noticed that on some dives if the boat sees a lift bag come up, they will send a diver down to verify the status of the dive team that shot the lift bag. They can bring more gas if necessary.
My point was that below 300 ft., I personally start to consider OC impractical. I was trained (by this same instructor) to be very conservative with my gas management when I deco dive. I have no reason to believe that Dr. Walker won't continue that tend. A rebreather would look like a great idea to me somewhere between the 200 and 300 ft. range for reasons of gas management. But, in Dr. Walker's book (and mine), the diver should always carry more than enough breathing gas on his/her person to do their deco without reaching the line.
Like Walter said, surfacing with that much deco left is not a pleasant thought.
#15
Posted 12 January 2005 - 09:13 PM
I sincerely hope you mean "normoxic"!There is only one step after this and that is the hypoxic trimix.
No, I've just thought about it and you're right. Just never heard it described as that before. I would have deleted my post to conceal the evidence if SD would let me!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users