Well, I have to say the info provided makes it extremely tempting. I will confer with my instructor-to-be on this and report back.Come to the Dark Side, Caetllonn."
BTW, has anyone heard of this organization?
Posted 07 November 2005 - 01:52 PM
Well, I have to say the info provided makes it extremely tempting. I will confer with my instructor-to-be on this and report back.Come to the Dark Side, Caetllonn."
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:08 PM
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:17 PM
Posted 07 November 2005 - 02:21 PM
You ever been to Florida? Let me give you my address...I must say it looks very intriguing ... very liberating!
Posted 07 November 2005 - 04:02 PM
1st....I would worry about chafing from my BC....BTW, has anyone heard of this organization?
Posted 07 November 2005 - 04:26 PM
"I was in the pool! I was in the pool! . . . There was shrinkage." George Costanza.BTW, has anyone heard of this organization?
Posted 07 November 2005 - 05:26 PM
maybe but its hell on ice diversI must say it looks very intriguing ... very liberating!
Posted 07 November 2005 - 06:00 PM
We had a group of them here in Belize some time ago, though not with my operation. The boat captain was quite surprised when he saw what they intended wearing on the boat and underwater - he had had no warning. He tells me it wasn't a pretty sight!BTW, has anyone heard of this organization?
Posted 07 November 2005 - 08:55 PM
Posted 07 November 2005 - 10:04 PM
Ok -- so what you are really saying is that instead of taking a little extra time with these divers you instead work with the LCD (lowest common demoninator) theory. Downgrade the gear instead of bringing the student up to par. If they started out in the pool with the gear they would know no different and the task loading would be lower. It is only if they started with one piece of gear and switched mid-class that it would be more difficult.PerroneFord-I'm not going to get into the PADI rant today. No point in it. However, most students tend to learn in jackets because that is what is in the rental fleet of most dive shops. This is PADI or otherwise.
As for students struggling with BP/W configs on the surface, I call BS. I had 6 dives under my belt when I got my BP/W and didn't have any trouble at all. Only skill required was "lean back".
I also don't know what DIR-IT has to do with backplates and wings. Because BP/W's were around long before DIR was even a thought in anyone's mind.
Please note I said SOME new divers have a hard time getting themselves vertical in the water with a back inflate system. I am not making this up. SOME new divers are very uncomfortable with their face being pushed toward the water. They find it stressful, feelike they are being held facedown in the water, begin to fight the BC, and..well... we know all about task loading.
I have no doubt you have the strength to easily position yourself.
For some this is simply not the case.
Thats all I was saying.
Posted 07 November 2005 - 10:29 PM
heck my hot pink bp can't possibly be dir can it?
Posted 07 November 2005 - 11:12 PM
Well you can see a bit of it here --heck my hot pink bp can't possibly be dir can it?
Now I'm going to have to come to California sometime, if only to get a gander at that bp in action.
It must truly be a sight to behold.
--but then again, so am I!!!
Platypusman
Posted 07 November 2005 - 11:26 PM
I see the issues that he refers to. OW classes do spend a fair amount of time near on the surface listening to directions. Just as likely, we put the students in gear that they are likely to be renting if they are using their own.Ok -- so what you are really saying is that instead of taking a little extra time with these divers you instead work with the LCD (lowest common demoninator) theory. Downgrade the gear instead of bringing the student up to par. If they started out in the pool with the gear they would know no different and the task loading would be lower. It is only if they started with one piece of gear and switched mid-class that it would be more difficult.
PerroneFord-I'm not going to get into the PADI rant today. No point in it. However, most students tend to learn in jackets because that is what is in the rental fleet of most dive shops. This is PADI or otherwise.
As for students struggling with BP/W configs on the surface, I call BS. I had 6 dives under my belt when I got my BP/W and didn't have any trouble at all. Only skill required was "lean back".
I also don't know what DIR-IT has to do with backplates and wings. Because BP/W's were around long before DIR was even a thought in anyone's mind.
Please note I said SOME new divers have a hard time getting themselves vertical in the water with a back inflate system. I am not making this up. SOME new divers are very uncomfortable with their face being pushed toward the water. They find it stressful, feelike they are being held facedown in the water, begin to fight the BC, and..well... we know all about task loading.
I have no doubt you have the strength to easily position yourself.
For some this is simply not the case.
Thats all I was saying.
You yourself said the back-inflate was superior for underwater even if you have your own personal bias against using the bp/w.
I don't understand training in one piece of gear then steering them to another piece of gear when it is time to buy.
Ok -- wtf is DIR-IT?
And really get over your bp/w = DIR --- the bp was around long before George and his merry men started the whole thing. To dive a bp does not make one dir -- heck my hot pink bp can't possibly be dir can it?
Posted 08 November 2005 - 02:26 AM
My eyes!!!!Well you can see a bit of it here --heck my hot pink bp can't possibly be dir can it?
Now I'm going to have to come to California sometime, if only to get a gander at that bp in action.
It must truly be a sight to behold.
--but then again, so am I!!!
Platypusman
Posted 08 November 2005 - 05:51 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users