Is anyone else creeped out by all the tracking the new site does?
#46
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:47 PM
Yeah I know: I've been branded a non-group person - doesn't play well with others. I am so upset. Let me know if you want to have some fun, without the drama - I'm good for that.
#47
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:49 PM
DandyDon... I send you a comment AND added you as a friend and I'm going to check your profile every day!! And next I'll add diverb0b! I'm going to join ScubaStacy in stalking all these great SD fellas. Yup, that's my dive plan!! Woo-hoo!!
So now instead of single divers - we are stalking divers I knew there was a reason I joined this site!
#48
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:49 PM
Admitting birth date by month and day only is not an option, so I changed the year on mine.
Actually, it became an option a while ago. This is why you will see some members celebrating their birthday without their age being listed by their name.
#49
Posted 23 March 2008 - 03:54 PM
So SD administrators, what is up with all of this? You all seem quite silent on this issue.... Tolly? Shadragon? Fordan??? What's up with this supreme level of transparency?
#50
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:06 PM
Actually, it became an option a while ago.
Actually, I just tried putting in Month Day... without the year, didnt' take it...
#51
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:26 PM
Nope, I don't think so.Actually, it became an option a while ago.
Actually, I just tried putting in Month Day... without the year, didnt' take it...
Yeah I know: I've been branded a non-group person - doesn't play well with others. I am so upset. Let me know if you want to have some fun, without the drama - I'm good for that.
#52
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:41 PM
This reply is from me-the-systems-librarian (in other words, what I do for a livin'). What we've got here is another example of social networking, which is all the rage in Web 2.0 (interactive web) circles. Examples: FaceBook, MySpace, del.icio.us (a web-based bookmarking site where users can optionally share their bookmarks for all to see, and you can jump laterally from your bookmarks to those of others), Flickr (photo sharing site), YouTube, Friendster (an early site with dating-related underpinnings), Twitter etc. For an example from the plain old business world... have you ever been on Amazon.com and see it refer to "people who bought book X also bought book Y"? Yes.. social networking!
Here's a definition from Danah Boyd, a Berkeley academic who specializes in this stuff: "We define social network sites as web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site."
We will see more and more migration like this, no matter what the site. That is not to say that visibility of profiles on sites cannot or should not be managed according to user discretion. Although I have nothing to do with our site administration, I am guessing that when our admins migrated to a new system, what was available to them was Web. 2.0-pointing technologies such as what we see here, as Web 1.0 technology is going the way of the dinosaur. "Old-fashioned" (Web 1.0) systems are just that, and for the most part further development of them has been capped if not killed. So any movement to a new system basically has to be in this direction, as that's what there is. (wow, how Zen of me!) There may be administrative hooks that our admins can put in place as they get to know the system better to limit visibility on our site, but that also varies from system to system. OK, 'nuff yakking from me!
#53
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:46 PM
Smart, nice, and pretty too...!Hi folks,
This reply is from me-the-systems-librarian (in other words, what I do for a livin'). What we've got here is another example of social networking, which is all the rage in Web 2.0 (interactive web) circles. Examples: FaceBook, MySpace, del.icio.us (a web-based bookmarking site where users can optionally share their bookmarks for all to see, and you can jump laterally from your bookmarks to those of others), Flickr (photo sharing site), YouTube, Friendster (an early site with dating-related underpinnings), Twitter etc. For an example from the plain old business world... have you ever been on Amazon.com and see it refer to "people who bought book X also bought book Y"? Yes.. social networking!
Here's a definition from Danah Boyd, a Berkeley academic who specializes in this stuff: "We define social network sites as web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system. The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to site."
We will see more and more migration like this, no matter what the site. That is not to say that visibility of profiles on sites cannot or should not be managed according to user discretion. Although I have nothing to do with our site administration, I am guessing that when our admins migrated to a new system, what was available to them was Web. 2.0-pointing technologies such as what we see here, as Web 1.0 technology is going the way of the dinosaur. "Old-fashioned" (Web 1.0) systems are just that, and for the most part further development of them has been capped if not killed. So any movement to a new system basically has to be in this direction, as that's what there is. (wow, how Zen of me!) There may be administrative hooks that our admins can put in place as they get to know the system better to limit visibility on our site, but that also varies from system to system. OK, 'nuff yakking from me!
Yeah I know: I've been branded a non-group person - doesn't play well with others. I am so upset. Let me know if you want to have some fun, without the drama - I'm good for that.
#54
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:47 PM
Admitting birth date by month and day only is not an option, so I changed the year on mine.
Actually, it became an option a while ago. This is why you will see some members celebrating their birthday without their age being listed by their name.
Although I'm 3rd generation "I don't give a ****" about who knows what about me - I do respect those who are not thrilled about these changes.
So much so, I went in and tried to set the year of my birth (1948) to "--" - and got an error message.
Either complete all the birthdate fields, or leave them all blank - we cannot process partial birthdates
So, despite what Michelle said, it don't look like it works the way she said it does. Not that I'm disagreeing with a woman, or a barrister, or a Canadian national, or the SO of one of the owners - but....
Jacques Yves Cousteau
#55
Posted 23 March 2008 - 04:51 PM
Nope, I don't think so.
Well, then perhaps you can enlighten this ignorant one on how to do it..
I went to my profile, clicked on the Birthday Unknown
Entered in the mm DD and then Saved...
It currently shows " Birthday Unknown "
Please share your confidence with me
Edited by fbp, 23 March 2008 - 04:55 PM.
#56
Posted 23 March 2008 - 05:44 PM
Orwell was prescient enough to see it coming and lucky enough to avoid it...
Tip of the iceberg...
Tech Support - The hard we do right away; the impossible takes us a little longer...
"I like ponies on no-stop diving. They convert "ARGH!! I'M GOING TO DIE" into a mere annoyance." ~Nigel Hewitt
#57 Guest_PlatypusMan_*
Posted 23 March 2008 - 07:04 PM
Admitting birth date by month and day only is not an option, so I changed the year on mine.
Actually, it became an option a while ago. This is why you will see some members celebrating their birthday without their age being listed by their name.
While this was true under the older software, it doesn't appear to be correct with the current software; I got an error message just now about the system being unable to process partial birthdates...so I took out all the B/D info.
PPM
#58
Posted 23 March 2008 - 07:10 PM
I don't have your real name, so can't check. How much do you make, anyway...??Just made me remember something on a similar subject...
The Sacramento Bee, our local newspaper just added a feature to their web site, where you can type in the name of a California State employee and get back the information on their job position and salary! No Kidding! I tested it and there I was and all my co-workers!
I couldn't believe it. Our HR person told me it's public domain info but just doesn't seem right! Now guess I won't be getting all the gold diggers after me anyway!
Stacy
LOL Sure not enough to dive like I want to that's for sure!
STACY'S NAME AND AGE REMOVED AS WE HAVE ALWAYS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED PEOPLE TO NOT REVEAL THEIR REAL NAMES ON THIS SITE AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO. She can share this information with anyone she desires via pm, email, in person etc. Thank you, Kamala
I have nothing to hide, all my serious crimes were under an alias and there isn't a field type in the profile for the few secrets I DO have! So I'm an open book! :-)
Edited by WreckWench, 23 March 2008 - 11:37 PM.
#59
Posted 23 March 2008 - 07:51 PM
No I was agreeing with you. You cannot avoid selecting a year. So I selected 2007.Nope, I don't think so.
Well, then perhaps you can enlighten this ignorant one on how to do it..
I went to my profile, clicked on the Birthday Unknown
Entered in the mm DD and then Saved...
It currently shows " Birthday Unknown "
Please share your confidence with me
Yeah I know: I've been branded a non-group person - doesn't play well with others. I am so upset. Let me know if you want to have some fun, without the drama - I'm good for that.
#60
Posted 23 March 2008 - 08:56 PM
I would like to know though, Can everyone see my address or is it just me??????
Edited by ScubaSis, 23 March 2008 - 08:59 PM.
If you can't eat it or play with it,
Just pee on it and walk away.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users